Message boards : Number crunching : Error while Downloading
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 18 Jan 18 Posts: 5 Credit: 7,810,533 RAC: 0 |
Just started getting this error in the last hour. Error while downloading This is across all my rigs, Thanks |
Send message Joined: 18 Jan 18 Posts: 5 Credit: 7,810,533 RAC: 0 |
Am I the only one getting errors? |
Send message Joined: 28 Oct 17 Posts: 220 Credit: 59,113 RAC: 14 |
Did you still has the problem? Two days ago there were a low internet speed randomly , but I ask my provider yesterday to check the line and he did not find any problem. |
Send message Joined: 18 Jan 18 Posts: 5 Credit: 7,810,533 RAC: 0 |
Did you still has the problem? Yes, I am still having issues. https://boinc.multi-pool.info/latinsquares/results.php?userid=1107&offset=0&show_names=0&state=6&appid= [/url] |
Send message Joined: 28 Oct 17 Posts: 220 Credit: 59,113 RAC: 14 |
I cannot access to your page. Can you send the register event in tools from your Boinc application related to this project (use a PM if it has potential sensible data in it). Thanks |
Send message Joined: 7 May 18 Posts: 1 Credit: 1,005,652 RAC: 0 |
Am I the only one getting errors? No, I have also been seeing this in the last few days and currently have around 200 tasks showing an "Error while downloading". Today my client had 33 tasks with this error, and my host was in a backoff period with 9 hours remaining. Work started flowing again after a manual update. I don't have time to look through the entire list but the few I looked at all had the same error message. <core_client_version>7.14.2</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> WU download error: couldn't get input files: <file_xfer_error> <file_name>input_odlk3_66_0253047_00043.txt</file_name> <error_code>-224 (permanent HTTP error)</error_code> <error_message>permanent HTTP error</error_message> </file_xfer_error> </message> ]]> I haven't had any network problems that I know of and this host picked up work from a second project without any problems. Team USA forum |
Send message Joined: 28 Oct 17 Posts: 220 Credit: 59,113 RAC: 14 |
Actually input_odlk3_66_0253047_00043.txt is effectively not present now in the server. I have double the max amount of workunits that one can download in a day, so it should help. |
Send message Joined: 22 Oct 17 Posts: 3083 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
Sorry to interfere. Here https://boinc.multi-pool.info/latinsquares/workunit.php?wuid=157127913 I see 189667883 84389 7 Sep 2019, 5:44:45 UTC 7 Sep 2019, 5:50:53 UTC Ошибка при загрузке 0.00 0.00 --- odlk3@home v1.00 The errors are obvious. What reason? I have double the max amount of workunits that one can download in a day, so it should help. That is, several WU will fly into the air? |
Send message Joined: 22 Oct 17 Posts: 3083 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
Actually input_odlk3_66_0253047_00043.txt is effectively not present now in the server. WU existed. It was not processed because there was a loading error. Now this WU is not on the server? So WU has disappeared and will not be processed? |
Send message Joined: 28 Oct 17 Posts: 220 Credit: 59,113 RAC: 14 |
I think that it is no present because the task generator create a DB entry for a workunit, but did not generate the workunit TXT file (so it is not present and you got a download error). But with 295.000 tasks being managed right now it is difficulty to catch the problem. |
Send message Joined: 22 Oct 17 Posts: 3083 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
But with 295.000 tasks being managed right now it is difficulty to catch the problem. What is the significance of the tasks that are being processed? Errors were with other tasks! You can see the errors, for example, here? https://boinc.multi-pool.info/latinsquares/workunit.php?wuid=157127913 Can you establish the cause of these errors? |
Send message Joined: 28 Oct 17 Posts: 220 Credit: 59,113 RAC: 14 |
Tasks ready to send 435163 Tasks being processed 289010 From log it seems like what I supposed. The generator generate a work-unit to add in the DB but not the associate TXT file, so when one takes that work-unit it has no TXT file to download. I'm investigating why. |
Send message Joined: 22 Oct 17 Posts: 3083 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
I see it myself. What does this have to do with errors? From log it seems like what I supposed. The generator generate a work-unit to add in the DB but not the associate TXT file, so when one takes that work-unit it has no TXT file to download. WU consists of two DLS, as far as I know. Do you assume that the erroneous WUs do not have these two squares? That is, there is a WU name, but there is no TXT file with squares? So, the problem is with WU generation? And again the same question: who did the WU generation? |
Send message Joined: 22 Oct 17 Posts: 3083 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
Задание 189667883 ТекÑÑ‚ протокола See https://boinc.multi-pool.info/latinsquares/result.php?resultid=189667883 What does error_code -200 mean? |
Send message Joined: 28 Oct 17 Posts: 220 Credit: 59,113 RAC: 14 |
They have to do to the way you can found the error. If you have 100 task to send and 50 task being processed it is simple to query the DB and follow all the log to catch a problem. With 435.000 WU is very hard. From log it seems like what I supposed. The generator generate a work-unit to add in the DB but not the associate TXT file, so when one takes that work-unit it has no TXT file to download. yes. A WU in BOINC is not only two DLS. The two DLS are the input for the client application only. At server side a WU are generated from some XML templates that has many paramethers in them and a TXT file to send to the client (the WU name is created to be unique). The WU are so stored in to the DB with all information unless the TXT file (for ODLK1 the input are only around 456 bytes - two DLS - but for project like SETI or Einstein they are MB of data that the client download). There can be more WUs with the same TXT file in it. Let's say an example. Project like PRIME GRID test a TXT file more that one time (2 or 3) to be sure that CPU bug did not produce false result (e.g it say that a number is prime and it is not). Else if a client terminate the WU calculation before it true finished (for example a user abandon the project), BOINC generate another WU with the same TXT for processing it again. The same happen if a WU is schedulated to be finished in a week and a user did not complete it in time. A new WU with the same TXT is generated and given to another user for being tested.
It is automatic as it is a daemon always running. I can suspect that having the queue going to 0 last week, the daemon has start to create WU at a too much high rate in short time to fill the queue, so the process that create a WU associating the TXT file has some fault that are not present during the normal activities. Let's say that the generator has a latent bug in it. |
Send message Joined: 22 Oct 17 Posts: 3083 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
It is automatic as it is a daemon always running. There is no automatic task generation in the project or it works very poorly. Otherwise, why was there such a Sprint? https://boinc.multi-pool.info/latinsquares/forum_thread.php?id=39 Why automatic generation does not support a constant number of available tasks? Why are tasks constantly decreasing to zero? An automatic generator must not allow this! Task generation is done by Progger. I know that at the very beginning Progger did it. I suggested he pass it on to you, but he did not agree, citing the fact that there are very complex things that you will have to explain. Consequently, Progger began to do task generation too quickly and made a mistake somewhere. So, are there still erroneous WUs in the database? A lot of them? What does Progger say? Are you in contact with him? By the way, it would not hurt him to clarify the situation here! |
Send message Joined: 22 Oct 17 Posts: 3083 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
Tasks decrease very quickly! Tasks ready to send 314738 There were over 600,000 tasks "ready to send". I suspect that many tasks were erroneous. If there is an automatic task generator, it should turn on when a certain minimal number of ready-made tasks is reached, and this number should never be reduced to zero. In addition, the automatic generator will not rush and make mistakes :) |
©2024 ©2024 Progger & Stefano Tognon (ice00) & Reese